K Sarath Chandra
The above bar diagram shows the supplementary food served to children belonging to below poverty line in various states of India. The Central government had launched many schemes to provide nutritious food to the children.
One such scheme is Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS), a unique primary social welfare scheme to tackle malnutrition and health problems in children below 6 years of age.
Special Nutrition Programme (SNP) is an another such scheme framed on the similar lines of ICDS with the same objective.
Since their launch, the two schemes ICDS and SNP have been successfully providing 300 calories (with 8-10 grams of protein) every day to all children below 6 years of age.
The four northeastern states like Arunachal Pradesh-94.4%, Sikkim-93.80% Mizoram-91.80%, and Nagaland-82.40% are far ahead than rest of the states in terms of supplying nutritious food to children.
The other four northeastern states like Assam-73.50%, Tripura-77.60% and Meghalaya-79.80% too have done reasonably well, with Manipur being the only state which is lagging behind with 44.90%.
The BIMARU states like Bihar-52.60%, Madhya Pradesh-68.20%, Rajasthan-55.60%, Uttar Pradesh-40.60% have fared poorly in taking these schemes to the public. Madhya Pradesh being an exception, as it has shown some progress. (The term BIMARU was coined by an economic analyst Ashish Bose in the mid-80s for the four backward northern states to describe their bad state of economy.)
Later, Odisha was included in the list resulting in BIMAROU. Odisha’s performance level in delivering the supplementary food is at 69.90%. (Several studies, including those by the UN, showed that the performance of the BIMARU states affected the GDP growth rate of India. Some of these states are also a part of Red Corridor (The areas facing Naxalite-Maoist insurgency). Since some of these states have now started to advance faster than some of the developed states, the concept of BIMARU is starting to become outdated.)
Even a trouble-torn state like Jammu and Kashmir has done well with 91.50%. But Punjab which is also called as Granary of India has shown dismal performance with 59.10%. Its neighbouring state Haryana too has fared poorly with 51.90%. Narendra Modi’s development work in his state is also reflected in the implementation of these schemes, with Gujarat registering 86.50%.
Among southern states, Karnataka is in the forefront with 80.40%, followed by states like Tamil Nadu-75.80%, Kerala-75.80% and Andhra Pradesh-73.70%.
The Union Territories too have not shown much progress with Daman and Diu registering 54.70%, followed by Delhi, the national capital with 56.40%, Puduchery-56.70%, Dadra and Nagar Haveli-60%, Chandigarh-68%.
The remaining states like Maharashtra registered 69.60%, followed by Goa-73.40%, Himachal Pradesh-77.10%, West Bengal-78.30%, Uttarakhand-81.90%, Chattisgarh-85.60%, Jharkhand-88.30%.
Thus, the Centre has introduced schemes like ICDS and SNP to improve the nutritional and health status, to lay the foundation for proper psychological, physical and social development and also to reduce the incidence of mortality, morbidity and malnutrition among children.